I'm not exactly sure how I feel about this issue. Parts I liked, parts I disliked and parts I plain could not understand.
Daken does a nice job of single handedly taking apart the X-Men with the Muramasa Blade. When all seems lost, Armour dives in providing us with the answer to whether the Murumasa Blade can cut through anything. So it can cut light (Cyclops' beam), can penetrate when Nightcrawler is teleporting and can sever admantium. But it can't cut Armour's psionic armour because it is made up of and idea rather than a physical substance. Okay, I'll take the leap here.
Lots of other questions though. Wolverine's reasoning as to why Daken didn't take the blade is idiotic. Who is Victor Hudson? He looks like the Russian villain Meltdown from the Havok/Wolverine 1988 mini. Wasn't his Weapon X partner named Hudson?
Anyway, I found Braithwite's pencils a little tough to follow in the action scenes. And I still could care less about Daken.